ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the RHD genotypes of RhD-negative pregnant women and explore the optimum strategy for fetal RHD screening among this population in the region. Methods:This prospective study recruited 33 cases of RhD-negative singleton pregnancies at ≥12 weeks of gestation in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from March to November 2021. On the basis of RHD genotyping, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify the exons 5 and 10 of RHD gene in the circulating cell-free DNA of RhD-negative pregnant women harboring whole RHD gene deletion and RHD-CE(2-9)- D. High-throughput sequencing was performed to detect chr1:25648453 locus from circulating cell-free DNA in plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women harboring RHD 1227A mutation to screen the fetal RhD blood group. Neonatal umbilical cord blood samples were collected for verifying fetal RHD genotyping. Descriptive statistical analysis was used. Results:Whole RHD gene deletion homozygous genotype ( n=20, 60.6%), RHD-CE(2-9) -D/whole RHD gene deletion heterozygous genotype ( n=5, 21.2%), RHD 1227A/whole RHD gene deletion heterozygous genotype ( n=7, 15.2%) and RHD 711delC/whole RHD gene deletion heterozygous genotype ( n=1) were identified in the 33 RhD-negative pregnant women. In the 25 cases with whole RHD gene deletion homozygous genotype or RHD-CE(2-9)- D/whole RHD gene deletion heterozygous genotype, 22 fetuses were RhD-positive and three were RhD-negative based on prenatal screening, which were confirmed by the neonatal serological test results after birth. In the seven cases carrying RHD 1227A/whole RHD gene deletion heterozygous genotype, all fetuses were RhD-positive, which were consistent with the results of serological detection after delivery. The case harboring RHD 711delC/whole RHD gene deletion heterozygous genotype did not receive fetal RHD screening. Conclusions:This study suggests that whole RHD gene deletion homozygous genotype is the most common allele in RhD-negative population in this area, followed by RHD 1227A/whole RHD gene deletion heterozygous genotype and RHD- CE(2-9)- D/whole RHD gene deletion heterozygous genotype. For women with whole RHD gene deletion homozygous genotype, RHD- CE(2-9)- D, or RHD 1227A mutation, fetal RHD screening with quantitative real-time PCR and high-throughput sequencing are important for the management of RhD-negative pregnant women.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the safety of trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) and clinical factors associated with successful TOLAC and to compare TOLAC with elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) in terms of obstetric and neonatal outcomes.Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted among gravidas who had a history of lower segment cesarean section and were hospitalized in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Medical School of Nanjing University from January to December 2014.Exclusion criteria included indications for caesarean section (such as placenta previa,placenta accreta,twin pregnancy,breech presentation and severe preeclampsia),serious maternal complications after cesarean section,lower uterine segment thinner than 3 mm and poor healing of uterine incision.Totally,287 gravidas were enrolled.Among them,142 chose TOLAC and the other 145 requested ERCS.Clinical data of those gravidas were collected and statistically analyzed by t-test,Log-rank test,Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.Results (1) The success rate of TOLAC was 90.8％ (129/142).There was no significant difference in maternal age,gestational age,thickness of lower uterine segment,interval between the two deliveries and neonatal birth weight and asphyxia rate between the successful (n=129) and unsuccessful (n=13) groups (all P＞0.05).Although the two groups had no significant difference in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) rate,the gravidas who failed in TOLAC lost more blood than those who succeeded [425 (195-675) vs 200 (50-1 400) ml,P＜0.05].Moreover,higher amniotic fluid contamination rate was observed in the unsuccessful group [6/13 vs 17.1％ (22/129),P＜0.05].In the TOLAC group,99.3％ (141/142) were under continuous fetal heart rate monitoring.Incomplete uterine rupture occurred in one women without serious maternal or neonatal outcomes.The reasons for 13 failed TOLAC cases were unbearable pain during labor,abnormal labor,fetal distress and threatened rupture of uterus.(2) Compared with the ERCS group,the TOLAC group showed shorter interval from last cesarean section to the indexed delivery[5 (2-18) vs 6 (2-19) years],younger maternal age [(31±4) vs (33 ±4) years old] and less blood loss [200 (50-1 400) vs 300 (100-1 500) ml] (all P＜0.05).Conclusion Our study shows that,those who preferred TOLAC were younger,or had shorter pregnancy interval from last cesarean section.The success rate of TOLAC is high for women undergoing systematic prenatal assessment and close management during labor with less blood loss and non-serious maternal and neonatal complications compared with ERCS.